This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] require makeinfo 4.2 or better

On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 06:33:39PM -0700, wrote:
> At Sat, 3 May 2003 01:12:55 +0000 (UTC), "DJ Delorie" wrote:
> > I think for this patch, manually applying it to both Makefile.tpl and
> > would be acceptable.
> > 
> > Oh, and... approved ;-)
> Thanks, i've applied to both gcc and src repositories.
> I suppose with the recent changes to use --no-split instead, this
> patch may not be strictly necessary on the GCC 3.3 branch, but it
> could be a boon to people building combined-tree builds with gcc +
> binutils 2.14 (and whatever texinfo happens to be installed on their
> systems).
> An alternative is to convert the binutils release branch
> Makefile.{in,tpl} to use --no-split instead (or to use both patches
> 8-), i guess.
> Thoughts? 
> Mark?  How about this for the gcc 3.3 branch?  (And, now, or after
> 3.3?  8-)
> Daniel, which (or both) would you like to see on the binutils branch?

I haven't been paying attention.  Why does binutils need it?

Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]