This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GCC inline parameters (PR 10160 testcase)

On Friday 02 May 2003 01:38 pm, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-05-02 at 11:25, John David Anglin wrote:
> > I believe that we are about to ship 3.3 with a set of inline parameter
> > defaults that are way too agressive.  These can cause huge increases
> > in compilation time and memory over that with a more conservative
> > set of parameters.
> >
> > This has been discussed before and Mark made some improvements.
> > However, PR 10160 hasn't been resolved and the problem with the
> > default inline parameter set remains.
> We can do something different for GCC 3.3.1, but it's too late in the
> game for 3.3.
> Thanks,

That sounds like the second: "Put a wrapper on your GCC" for 3.3;
The warning message issue and now the in-line parameters issue.

If it is necessary ship a release with possible "wrapper" requirements;
could that information make it into the "NEWS" or "Release Notes" or
anything that ships with the release tar-ball that the user might read?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]