This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: C++ EH vs Forced Unwinding, Round 3


On Fri, 2 May 2003 13:48:55 -0700, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:

> No, this isn't really sufficient.  You skipped over the bit where
> it's non-negotiable that we retain control of the unwinding process
> with the _Unwind_ForceUnwind hook.  

I think the real dispute here is over whether cancellation should use
forced unwind, as Mark asked earlier in the discussion.

Does anyone disagree with always using my solution for longjmp_unwind?

Jason


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]