This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ EH vs Forced Unwinding, Round 3
On Fri, 2 May 2003 13:48:55 -0700, Richard Henderson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> No, this isn't really sufficient. You skipped over the bit where
> it's non-negotiable that we retain control of the unwinding process
> with the _Unwind_ForceUnwind hook.
I think the real dispute here is over whether cancellation should use
forced unwind, as Mark asked earlier in the discussion.
Does anyone disagree with always using my solution for longjmp_unwind?