This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Unreviewed QNX patches
- From: <gp at qnx dot com>
- To: "Jim Wilson" <wilson at tuliptree dot org>, <gp at qnx dot com>
- Cc: <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 13:20:58 -0000
- Subject: Re: Unreviewed QNX patches
Exactly the kind of feedback I was looking for. I'll get on it and repost
Jim Wilson <email@example.com> said:
> firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > Just hoping someone will look at the following and help me get them approved.
> I'm willing to look at patches for misc embedded ports. I am a little
> rusty though, and hence not as efficient as I should be.
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-04/msg01060.html
> As Richard mentioned, this isn't a QNX patch, it is a SYSROOT patch. I
> suggest reposting with an accurate subject line. Also, I noticed that
> this link has no justication for the patch. That is probably in an
> earlier message, but I don't know which one offhand. Also, I noticed
> that the patch below has a link to an alternate version of this patch
> which is apparently an older version to be ignored, which is a little
> confusing. So a repost with accurate subject line (SYSROOT),
> justification, and current verison of the patch would be helpful.
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-04/msg00236.html
> This contains a number of patches to different parts of gcc that should
> be submitted separately. For instance, I noticed that there are
> libstdc++ patches in the middle of this. These should be submitted
> separately with appropriate subject line so that a libstdc++ person will
> look at them. The fixinc patches should be submitted separately so that
> a fixinc person can look at them. The include/stddef.h patch should be
> a separate patch, since it brings up other issues. The lt* files come
> from the libtool package. Patches to those files need to be submitted
> to the libtool maintainer first, and then merged into gcc after they get
> into libtool. See
> The rest of the patches are the qnx port proper, and I can review them
> independently of the rest of the patches, which I will try to do Friday
> or Saturday.