This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Split encode_section_info hook: one for decls, one forconstants

From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 21:25:51 -0700
Subject: Re: Split encode_section_info hook: one for decls, one forconstants
References: <8765pegb6l.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><20030416192315.GG12771@redhat.com><87istedy4i.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><20030416214639.GA3572@redhat.com>

Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com> writes:

> Perhaps this should wait for finishing the symbol_ref_flags cleanup?
> I expect most of the encode_section_info routines to vanish.

Okay.  Are you planning to do them all yourself?  Or should I try to
chip in?  (Won't have time this week, unfortunately.)

zw

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Split encode_section_info hook: one for decls, one for constants
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- Split encode_section_info hook: one for decls, one for constants
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Split encode_section_info hook: one for decls, one for constants
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Split encode_section_info hook: one for decls, one forconstants
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Split encode_section_info hook: one for decls, one for constants
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]