This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Do not call uses_template_parms() unless necessary



On Tuesday, April 15, 2003, at 10:58 AM, Mark Mitchell wrote:


On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 10:48, Geoffrey Keating wrote:

On Tuesday, April 15, 2003, at 09:39 AM, Mark Mitchell wrote:


On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 17:31, Ziemowit Laski wrote:
This super-trivial patch has been pre-approved by Geoff; I will
place it in 3.3 and mainline.

Not without a test case you won't. :-)

It's a very small speed improvement (it also helps for objective-C++).

Oh, I thought it was a correctness thing.


If it's a speed improvement, it needs a comment.

And if we're going to start factoring NULL tests out of functions to
avoid function call overhead, the the right way to do that is:

bool predicate_f (tree);

#define predicate(T) ((T) ? predicate_f ((T)) : false)

or the equivalent version with an inline function.

We may as well take these wins everywhere, and keep the code tidy, then
spread this stuff out all over the place.

Otherwise, there's high likelihood I will rip that out the next time I
encounter it, as soon as I notice it's redundant with the body of the
function.

Apparently, this is the only place in the cp frontend where this function might be called with a NULL value. (I'm not too worried about anyone suddenly noticing the test is redundant, it took me several minutes to trace the code flow to be sure that in fact the patch was safe.)


--
Geoff Keating <geoffk at apple dot com>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]