This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Fix bitfield behaviour

From: "Christian Ehrhardt" <ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:37:34 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Fix bitfield behaviour
References: <20030414171612.28435.qmail@thales.mathematik.uni-ulm.de> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0304142038390.15399@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>

On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 08:44:18PM +0100, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Did your patch pass the GDB testsuite with no regressions, as well as the
> GCC testsuite?  It it the GDB testsuite that showed up some of the
> problems with Neil's patch.

I ran the gdb testsuite from gdb-5.3 on sparc-sun-solaris2.9 after I read
your mail. It didn't show any regressions.
Note that I compiled gdb only once WITH the patch and then ran the
testsuite twice with a gcc that has the patch and with a gcc that doesn't.
I don't know if I have time to run the gdb testsuite on x86 as well this
week and I'm away from mail next week.

    regards   Christian

-- 
THAT'S ALL FOLKS!

References:
- [PATCH] [RFC] Fix bitfield behaviour
  - From: Christian Ehrhardt
- Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Fix bitfield behaviour
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]