This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] TLS support for powerpc and powerpc64
- From: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>
- To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>, Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>, Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:21:49 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] TLS support for powerpc and powerpc64
On Friday, April 11, 2003, at 09:31 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
(legitimize_tls_address): New.
(encode_tls_info): New.
(get_some_local_dynamic_name): New.
(get_some_local_dynamic_name_1): New.
Is there a reason why some of the new functions do not have
"rs6000_" prepended to them? If not, they should use the function
naming
convention for consistency and to prevent name collisions in the
future.
I like and use this convention, but we should be aware that it is not
C89-compliant (names should be unique in 6 characters).