Re: c++ failures

[Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>]

Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com> writes:

| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| 
| > I bootstrapped and tested mainline as of -D'20030225 14:00' (which
| > does not include my patch) and now the failures are reduced to:
| >    FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Wunused-2.C  (test for warnings, line 5)
| this has been happenning for a long time.
| 
| >    FAIL: g++.dg/warn/implicit-typename1.C  (test for warnings, line 16)
| I think this is a test that is no longer correct for the new parser
| 
| >    FAIL: pch/system-1.C -g assembly comparison
| >    FAIL: pch/system-1.C -O2 -g assembly comparison
| These have failed for me ever since pch went in
| 
| >    FAIL: g++.eh/spec6.C instantiated from here (test for errors, line 28)
| >    FAIL: g++.eh/spec6.C (test for excess errors)
| don't know

Thanks,

  Now that is getting more and more interesting:  I undid the patch

      http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2003-02/msg01216.html

and I'm *still* seeing the failures.  Do you concur?

-- Gaby