This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: CFG merge part 7 - superblock/trace scheduling


Jan Hubicka wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > This patch adds option to enable superblock scheduling (aka EBB scheduler) for
> > non-IA-64 targets as well as "trace scheduling" (aka EBB scheduler preceeded by
> > the trace formation).
> > My experience with this feature are bit mixed - by default it causes 2%
> > regression on Athlon.  By significantly improving MD description I was able to
> 
> This regression seems to go away after changing the superblock choice
> algorithm I sent in merge patch 11.

Jan, I've just checked trace scheduling on ia64 (intel itanium 900MHz
server).  I needed to make some modifications for the compiler to switch
it on for ia64.  It still has some test degradation but I managed to
compile all SPECINT benchmarks except eon.  Unfortunately, there is no
big improvement for code quality.  Here the results in brief are:

  o code quality improvement is 0.5% (Spec rate excluding eon is 406.38
vs 404.52).
  o slower compiler speed about 2% (user time is 11m27s vs 11m14s).
  o bigger code about 20% (overall size of text segments is  9486Kb vs
7662Kb).

As for code quality, there are improvements (the biggest is on gzip a
bit less 3%!) and degradation only on vpr parser gap and bzip2.  So I
think the trace scheduling should be not used without profile
information.

Vlad


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]