This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
- From: Kaoru Fukui <k_fukui at highway dot ne dot jp>
- To: ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, k_fukui at highway dot ne dot jp, mark at codesourcery dot com
- Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 03:05:49 +0900 (JST)
- Subject: Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
- Reply-to: Kaoru Fukui <k_fukui at highway dot ne dot jp>
On 21 Feb, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> > From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
> >
> > "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu> writes:
> >
> > | > From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
> > | >
> > | > Just to make sure I'm clear, I don't object in any way to
> > | > backporting changes that speed up the compiler -- as long as
> > | > the person approving them feels that they're safe. Let's not
> > | > do anything too radical, but relatively simple changes are
> > | > fine.
> > |
> > | Are there any more anyone would like to recommend for consideration?
> >
> > Not one that is currently on mainline.
> > -- Gaby
>
> Ok, I'm asking because various people claim 3.4 is faster than 3.3
> (independent of 3.4-only things like PCH.) I wonder if that's still
> the case.
>
mainline 3.4 was included Zack's BI tree which was just faster than the
mainline(this is 3.3 now) on that tme.
Kaoru