This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fix for configuring targets that need extra flags

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: sean at mcneil dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 17:03:28 -0500
Subject: Re: Fix for configuring targets that need extra flags
References: <1045777138.89194.3.camel@blue.mcneil.com> <200302202153.h1KLrqk13649@greed.delorie.com> <1045778360.89194.17.camel@blue.mcneil.com>

> The reason I use CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET is that CPPFLAGS_FOR_TARGET didn't
> seem to be part of the collection of flags that gets passed through the
> recursive make process.  At least not at the time I did this (which was
> quite a while ago).  I haven't looked at it anytime recently.

There *isn't* a CPPFLAGS_FOR_TARGET.  If we couldn't use
CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET we'd have to make one up.

References:
- Fix for configuring targets that need extra flags
  - From: Sean McNeil
- Re: Fix for configuring targets that need extra flags
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: Fix for configuring targets that need extra flags
  - From: Sean McNeil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]