This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [WWW] wwwdocs/testing/index.html patch

>>>>> "Gerald" == Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> writes:

  Gerald> Well, but how do you currently decide which branches are
  Gerald> actively maintained, that is, how do you currently decide
  Gerald> which branches to test?

I would hope that the SC, for instance, knows what branches are
actively being maintained.  Being a volunteer project, it is simply
not feasible to maintain all versions forever.  I assume that, for
instance, 3.0 is no longer actively maintained.  If someone reports a
bug in the 3.0 series, will anyone fix it?

I had assumed that this sort of thing was decided long ago and, from
reading gcc.gnu.org's web pages, concluded that 3.2, 3.3 and mainline
were the branches under active development/maintenance.  Am I wrong?

Ben
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]