This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: 3.2/3.3/3.4 Lookup in Nested Class


Mike Stump <mstump@apple.com> writes:

| On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 11:24 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > Jeffrey Oldham <oldham@codesourcery.com> writes:
| >
| > | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > | > Jeffrey Oldham <oldham@codesourcery.com> writes:
| > | > Hi,
| > | > | Index: g++.old-deja/g++.other/lookup24.C
| > | > Ideally, new testcases should go in g++.dg.
| > |
| > | I used the documentation in gcc/testsuite/README to guide where I
| > | placed the new test.  It says "almost all C++ tests reside in
| > | subdirectories of g++.old-deja" and "Tests that want to use the
| > normal
| > | dg.exp driver can be put in g++.dg instead.  This may be required for
| > | platform-specific tests, or tests with other special requirements."
| > | If this is wrong, would someone please revise it?
| >
| > Yes, I think the documentation is wrong.
| 
| I don't think so.

Some time ago, we had a discussion and agreed that all new testcases
should go under g++.dg. That is even why some of us (Jason mostly)
spent time in the g++.dg stuff.

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]