This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: more flexible sbb/adc patterns
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 05:53:49PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > ! (if_then_else:SI (match_operator 1 "ix86_carry_flag_operator"
> > ! [(reg 17) (const_int 0)])
>
> Why not just use match_operand and check the register/zero
> bits at the same time?
I was thinking about that too, but then I convenienced myself that I
should make it to look same as the rest of patterns do.
Whats about chaging all of them in separate patch? It would also make
named patterns more usefull again.
Honza
>
> The rest of it looks sensible.
>
>
> r~