This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: fold math functions

From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 13:35:52 +0100
Subject: Re: fold math functions
References: <20030124231919.GG12802@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200301260324.WAA24914@makai.watson.ibm.com>

> >>>>> Jan Hubicka writes:
> 
> > now we are finally ready to actually simplify the math functions I hope.
> 
> 	How is this patch now correct in general?  Where does it test if
> the alternate precision match functions are available on the target?

Yes, I've added TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS for this purpose, so it should be
safe now.  It defaults to 0, after target deprecation session I plan to
revisit each port and set it to 0 by hand and change default to 1 as
that is wiser choice for the future when we can expect most targets to
support C99 runtime.

Honza
> 
> David

References:
- Re: fold math functions
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: fold math functions
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]