This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libiberty: hashtab allocation functions with an extra argument
> This trailed off without any further input. Is my original approach
> going to be OK?
I think the only unresolved issue is the naming of the extra functions
and fields. "foo_extra_arg" was just too ugly ;)
In MS-Land, They use "Foo()" and "FooEx()" for the short and long
versions of each function call. I suppose we could use
htab_create_ex() for the "extended" call. Can we think of any other
parameters we might like to pass to htab, so we don't have to do this
again?