This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: move MUST_PASS_IN_STACK out of line
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Jan 2003 22:22:35 -0200
- Subject: Re: move MUST_PASS_IN_STACK out of line
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <20030120232014.GA15306@redhat.com>
On Jan 20, 2003, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:
> #ifndef MUST_PASS_IN_STACK
> ! extern bool default_must_pass_in_stack PARAMS((enum machine_mode, tree));
> ! #define MUST_PASS_IN_STACK(MODE,TYPE) default_must_pass_in_stack(MODE, TYPE)
If a target defines MUST_PAST_IN_STACK, the prototype is omitted, so
the compilation of the function gives a warning, no?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer