This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Warnings patrol
- From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 15:26:44 -0500
- Subject: Re: Warnings patrol
>>>>> Zack Weinberg writes:
Zack> My point seems to have gone past everyone. I was suggesting that,
Zack> instead of adding yet another configure check, we simply rely on
Zack> <ldfcn.h> to declare this routine. Only if this provokes an actual
Zack> report of a problem should we put in a configure check and conditional
Zack> declaration.
I reported the target OSes for which the function is not declared
in an earlier message. We cannot remove the declaration completely.
David