This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Is this patch needed for configure.in?
- From: John Marshall <johnm at falch dot net>
- To: Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 15:35:54 +0100
- Subject: Re: Is this patch needed for configure.in?
- Organization: Falch.net
- References: <20030119234609.GA668@doctormoo>
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 06:46:09PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> I committed this.
> * configure.in: Add missing \.
> * configure: Rebuilt.
And also for the 3.3 branch, perhaps, please?
This \ does make a difference for people who want to use ${target_tools}
in their $noconfigdirs snippet. (Of course, I don't really know if
that's kosher :-).) Our one-day-to-be-contributed-hopefully port has
arm-*-palmos*)
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${target_libs} ${target_tools}"
;;
and at the moment we have the hunk below in our local patches, which is
a little bit annoying.
John "I'd try to call that a (obvious) bug fix :-)"
* configure.in: Add missing \.
--- configure.in 2002-11-28 21:27:44.000000000 +0100
+++ configure.in.new 2003-01-20 15:28:12.000000000 +0100
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ target_libs="target-libiberty \
target-newlib \
${libstdcxx_version} \
target-libf2c \
- ${libgcj}
+ ${libgcj} \
target-libobjc"
# these tools are built using the target libs, and are intended to run only