Re: Is this patch needed for configure.in?

[Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>]

Op zo 19-01-2003, om 16:53 schreef Diego Novillo:
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> 
> > Not sure if this is correct, so I'll just pass it to you.
> > 
> > It seems to help me get around a libgfor (g95 runtime)
> > configure problem.  But since nobody else complained,
> > I'm not sure it it's necessary to have a slash there...
> > 
> It sure looks necessary.  But I still get libobjc built without
> it.  Odd.
> 
> I recommend submitting a patch to mainline.  The bug is there
> too.

Could somebody with a better understanding of the configure system have
a look at this... is the slash supposed to be there, or not?

Greetz
Steven

Index: configure.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/gcc/gcc/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.213
diff -c -3 -r1.213 configure.in
*** configure.in	17 Jan 2003 08:02:23 -0000	1.213
--- configure.in	19 Jan 2003 23:37:02 -0000
***************
*** 161,167 ****
  		target-newlib \
  		${libstdcxx_version} \
  		target-libf2c \
! 		${libgcj}
  		target-libobjc"
  
  # these tools are built using the target libs, and are intended to run only
--- 161,167 ----
  		target-newlib \
  		${libstdcxx_version} \
  		target-libf2c \
! 		${libgcj} \
  		target-libobjc"
  
  # these tools are built using the target libs, and are intended to run only