This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: powerpc switches


Aldy Hernandez wrote:
   if (rs6000_cpu == PROCESSOR_PPC8540)
!     {
!       rs6000_isel = 1;
!       if (!TARGET_SPE)
! 	warning ("not configured for spe extensions");
!     }
what do you suggest, a completely separate test?
	if (cpu == 8540 && !target_spe)
	warning (...)
without something like that you get a confusing
'implicit declaration of '__builtin_spe_whatever''
if you've remembered to -Wall. Without -Wall, you get an
even worse type mismatch, as the return type defaults to int.

nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::     CodeSourcery LLC
         The voices in my head said this was stupid too
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]