This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Analysis of solaris2 27_io/istream_extractor_arith.cc failures
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- Cc: ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 21:39:16 -0600
- Subject: Re: Analysis of solaris2 27_io/istream_extractor_arith.cc failures
- References: <200212261347.IAA14641@caip.rutgers.edu><m3adiszvb6.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><200212261708.MAA10791@caip.rutgers.edu><20030104183632.51820821.bkoz@redhat.com><m3bs2wl5ui.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
>| testsuite/27_io/istream_extractor_arith/01.cc
>| testsuite/27_io/istream_extractor_arith/02.cc
>| testsuite/27_io/istream_extractor_arith/03.cc
>
>Furthermore, if possible, I would like to see files numbered after the
>sub-paragraphs number in the C++ definition. That may make tracking
>easier.
Seemingly, yes.
Why don't you give as complete an answer as you can, given this file and
the twelve existant tests. How would you number it?
-benjamin