Re: verbose terminate() on by default

[Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>]

On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 02:06:47PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> 
> Dynamic linking is not always available on embedded systems, where
> code size matters the most.  The verbose implementation may bring in a
> lot of stuff that the developer may have tried hard to avoid using.

Yeah, we should do something special with freestanding environments.
I threw out some thoughts on the libstdc++ list, for the previous patch:

    http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2002-12/msg00253.html

and Nathan commented in a followup.


Phil

-- 
I would therefore like to posit that computing's central challenge, viz. "How
not to make a mess of it," has /not/ been met.
                                                 - Edsger Dijkstra, 1930-2002