This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: proposed fix for PR c++/8662




--On Wednesday, November 27, 2002 03:30:03 PM -0800 Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com> wrote:

I wrote:

In PR 8662, we accept

class { int i; } a;
void foo() { a.i; }

without a diagnostic.  The reason is that, for the anonymous classes,
nothing in the flow notes whether the keyword "class" or "struct" was
given, as handle_class_head is not called.
Mark Mitchell wrote:

Your patch looks correct to me.
Did you otherwise bootstrap/test it?
Yes, on i686-pc-linux-gnu; no regressions.  I sent you a message a while
back stating this, but don't see it in the gcc-patches archive so I'll
send it again.

Would you be willing to apply it?  I don't have write permission (and
there are some reasons for that).
Done.

I couldn't find a ChangeLog or patch for a test case, so I did that
myself.

--
Mark Mitchell                mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]