This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Undocumented source files
firstname.lastname@example.org (Per Bothner) wrote on 24.11.02 in <3DE10FAE.email@example.com>:
> Phil Edwards wrote:
> > In the latest version, Doxygen produces HTML and LaTeX, which should cover
> > most of the output worries. The "info" format would be a horrible format
> > anyhow for the kind of thing that we typically want out of doxygen.
> I'd like to retire the 'info' format, but the 'info' *program* has
> advantages that are not yet bettered:
> (1) Works well on terminals.
> (2) A nice keyboard interface that is efficient for both browsing
> and for sequential reading.
Your definition of "nice" is certainly not mine, nor that of many other
>From where I sit, the *user interface* for info is crap. However, I do
agree that the *functionality* seems to be hard to replace with current
I suspect what I'd like would be the functionality of info, the file
format of xhtml, and a halfway sane user interface instead of taking the
worst features of Emacs. Maybe looking similar to pinfo, though I'm
certainly not all that fond of the lynx UI either.