This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Unreviewed^2 patch: libtool.m4 changes for multilib
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Cc: Ulrich Weigand <weigand at immd1 dot informatik dot uni-erlangen dot de>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <aj at suse dot de>, <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Date: 19 Nov 2002 21:19:44 -0200
- Subject: Re: Unreviewed^2 patch: libtool.m4 changes for multilib
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0211192138550.28686-100000@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
On Nov 19, 2002, Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
>>> The rules for patches for libtool files is that, if they're in the
>>> libtool CVS repository, they're pre-approved, otherwise, they have to
>>> be submitted there, then merged in here.
>> Ah, I wasn't aware of that. Thanks!
> codingconventions.html does have a bit on that, but it doesn't seem so
> clear about this "pre-approved rule".
Tell you what... I think I made it up when composing my reply. I
don't think we ever agreed on that. The burden of reviewing such
patches, even back-ports of patches for CVS libtool, is on me, so...
> Would one of you mind updating that? :)
As much as I'd like to do it, I now feel it would be safer not to do
it.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer