This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [basic-improvements] try/finally support for c/c++ - more tests




--On Thursday, November 07, 2002 05:43:28 PM -0800 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:

On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 05:26:38PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
Except that it also handles asynchronous exceptions, which ours doesn't.
Heh.  Not that I've tried, but I bet theirs doesn't *really* handle
asynchronous exceptions any more than ours does.  I bet the best they
can actually handle properly are synchronous exceptions -- which we
can also do with -fnon-call-exceptions.

The difference between SIGFPE and SIGALRM is very significant.
You're probably correct.  They handle the SIGFPE, SIGSEGV, etc., kind
of stuff -- probably not SIGALRM.

--
Mark Mitchell                mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]