This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [basic-improvements] try/finally support for c/c++ - more tests

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "jason at redhat dot com" <jason at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 16:12:24 -0800
Subject: Re: [basic-improvements] try/finally support for c/c++ - more tests
References: <20021106124304.G10988@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <8450000.1036625540@warlock.codesourcery.com> <20021107000307.GQ22215@redhat.com> <m3el9yz1bi.fsf@soliton.integrable-solutions.net>

On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 01:10:57AM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> | Further, try/catch/rethrow does not express what happens when
> | you use goto/break/continue/return to leave the try block.
> 
> Leaving a scope always implies destructors being run for local
> objects. 

Correct.  But it doesn't imply running Y in Mark's example.
Which is exactly my point.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [basic-improvements] try/finally support for c/c++ - more tests
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- [basic-improvements] try/finally support for c/c++ - more tests
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [basic-improvements] try/finally support for c/c++ - more tests
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [basic-improvements] try/finally support for c/c++ - more tests
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [basic-improvements] try/finally support for c/c++ - more tests
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]