This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: SSE fix 22 - movti fix

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:04:04 -0700
Subject: Re: SSE fix 22 - movti fix
References: <20021022151055.GH17210@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20021022210050.GD16519@redhat.com> <20021022212052.GC32567@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:20:52PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> How we will handle vector zeros then?
> CONST_VECTOR is never passed CONST_DOUBLE_OK*
> Should I define another constraint for 0 vectors?

Hum.  Well, I guess we've nothing better than EXTRA_CONSTRAINT for that.
At which point, you might as well use it for const0_rtx as well.

I've changed my mind.  Ok.

r~

References:
- SSE fix 22 - movti fix
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: SSE fix 22 - movti fix
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: SSE fix 22 - movti fix
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]