This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa]: Add two needed list functions, de-privativefind_refs_in_stmt
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 26 Sep 2002 07:11:55 -0400
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa]: Add two needed list functions, de-privativefind_refs_in_stmt
- References: <74B32D24-D119-11D6-83C8-000393575BCC@dberlin.org>
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 02:30, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> What's the harm in having access to find_refs_in_stmt in this
> particular case (I understand it's not something you might want to
> expose in general, but anything that actually generates *new* SIMPLE
> statements, rather than just modifying existing ones, will probably
> need to have access to it)?
Oh, no harm at all. I was merely curious because it wasn't immediately
obvious from your patch. Now I understand, thanks.