This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: simtest-howto

From: kaih at khms dot westfalen dot de (Kai Henningsen)
To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 26 Sep 2002 08:57:00 +0200
Subject: Re: simtest-howto
Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail.
Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding?
References: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0209241655140.49614-100000@dair.pair.com> <20020923212626.GD20473@codesourcery.com> <Pine.BSF.4.44.0209241655140.49614-100000@dair.pair.com> <20020924214107.GI5021@codesourcery.com>

zack@codesourcery.com (Zack Weinberg)  wrote on 24.09.02 in <20020924214107.GI5021@codesourcery.com>:

> Further, I doubt my suggested procedure is any harder on the machine
> than the existing one - even if gcc is checked out from subversions,
> you still have to get binutils/gdb/sim/newlib from sources.  (If this
> is really a concern, we should get subversions to mirror the uberbaum
> and/or src repositories.)

I seem to recall that the Uberbaum is mostly a set of symbolic links  
anyway; the src repository is probably the more important part.

MfG Kai

References:
- simtest-howto (was: Re: There can be only one version_string)
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
- Re: There can be only one version_string
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: simtest-howto (was: Re: There can be only one version_string)
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]