Re: [tree-ssa] fix botched renaming

[Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>]

On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at 03:50  PM, Richard Henderson wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 03:45:08PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > Yes, but you also claimed i didn't compile the changes, implying i'm
> > not careful about doing so, which i did, and am.
> You didn't compile the changes you committed, and that's a fact.
Yes, but not the same fact you claimed in the original message, and 
thus, irrelevant.
You said: "Do us the favour of at least _compiling_ your changes."
Which is
1. Rude, for no good reason (which is why i even bothered to reply).
2. Incorrect. I compiled my changes.  However, all of them were not 
what was committed.  There is a difference.
You make it seem like the changes in question were untested, which they 
were not.
The changes were not broken, the commit was.
> If you need separate check-outs for separate changes, please do so.
Once again, this is also rude, for no good reason.
If you feel the need to berate or belittle me, please do so privately.
I don't need your help in managing my development environment.  If 
you'd like to watch my typing and make sure i don't spell things wrong 
once every two years, feel free.
--Dan