This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: fix execute/20020412-1.c


On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 08:22:21PM +0100, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> I'm not sure if store_one_arg is wrong here - it passes as
> alignment PARM_BOUNDARY.  This is the correct as alignment
> of the 8 byte slot where the argument is passed, but it is not the
> alignment of the place where the struct tiny is actually stored.

Is this fixed by 

  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-09/msg00972.html

if you remove the #ifdef ARGS_GROW_DOWNWARD around
the FUNCTION_ARG_PADDING check?

Additionally, we should probably be examining SIZE before
dropping the alignment all the way down to BITS_PER_UNIT.


r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]