This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[patch] Fix comment typos.


Hi,

Attached is a patch to fix comment typos.  Committed as obvious.

Kazu Hirata

2002-09-14  Kazu Hirata  <kazu@cs.umass.edu>

	* config/fr30/fr30.h: Fix comment typos.
	* config/frv/frv.c: Likewise.
	* config/i386/xmmintrin.h: Likewise.
	* config/mips/mips.c: Likewise.
	* config/sh/sh.c: Likewise.

Index: fr30/fr30.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/fr30/fr30.h,v
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -u -r1.40 fr30.h
--- fr30/fr30.h	21 Aug 2002 23:24:12 -0000	1.40
+++ fr30/fr30.h	14 Sep 2002 13:32:26 -0000
@@ -992,7 +992,7 @@
    
    * indexed addressing using small signed offsets from the frame pointer
 
-   * register plus register addresing using R13 as the base register.
+   * register plus register addressing using R13 as the base register.
 
    At the moment we only support the first two of these special cases.  */
    
Index: frv/frv.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/frv/frv.c,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.5 frv.c
--- frv/frv.c	5 Sep 2002 20:58:49 -0000	1.5
+++ frv/frv.c	14 Sep 2002 13:32:34 -0000
@@ -3552,7 +3552,7 @@
 {
   rtx ret = NULL_RTX;
 
-  /* Don't try to legitimize addreses if we are not optimizing, since the
+  /* Don't try to legitimize addresses if we are not optimizing, since the
      address we generate is not a general operand, and will horribly mess
      things up when force_reg is called to try and put it in a register because
      we aren't optimizing.  */
Index: i386/xmmintrin.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/i386/xmmintrin.h,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.5 xmmintrin.h
--- i386/xmmintrin.h	8 May 2002 23:05:41 -0000	1.5
+++ i386/xmmintrin.h	14 Sep 2002 13:32:35 -0000
@@ -871,7 +871,7 @@
   __builtin_ia32_storeups (__P, (__v4sf)__A);
 }
 
-/* Store four SPFP values in reverse order.  The addres must be aligned.  */
+/* Store four SPFP values in reverse order.  The address must be aligned.  */
 static __inline void
 _mm_storer_ps (float *__P, __m128 __A)
 {
Index: mips/mips.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/mips/mips.c,v
retrieving revision 1.226
diff -u -r1.226 mips.c
--- mips/mips.c	4 Sep 2002 16:24:22 -0000	1.226
+++ mips/mips.c	14 Sep 2002 13:32:44 -0000
@@ -8092,7 +8092,7 @@
    precisely correct.
 
    When not mips16 code nor embedded PIC, if a symbol is in a
-   gp addresable section, SYMBOL_REF_FLAG is set prevent gcc from
+   gp addressable section, SYMBOL_REF_FLAG is set prevent gcc from
    splitting the reference so that gas can generate a gp relative
    reference.
 
Index: sh/sh.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/sh/sh.c,v
retrieving revision 1.174
diff -u -r1.174 sh.c
--- sh/sh.c	14 Sep 2002 13:12:55 -0000	1.174
+++ sh/sh.c	14 Sep 2002 13:32:51 -0000
@@ -3862,7 +3862,7 @@
   split_branches (first);
 
   /* The INSN_REFERENCES_ARE_DELAYED in sh.h is problematic because it
-     also has an effect on the register that holds the addres of the sfunc.
+     also has an effect on the register that holds the address of the sfunc.
      Insert an extra dummy insn in front of each sfunc that pretends to
      use this register.  */
   if (flag_delayed_branch)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]