This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Fix memory problems with large jumpy functions[patch]


On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 08:54, Michael Matz wrote:

> Well, you won't allocate that much memory for each instance of a tree_ref,
> just enough for the real type.  (Again I'm not sure if you do this at
> all).  I.e. the size of the union is irrelevant.
> 
Yeah, now I remember talking about this approach with Jason.  Currently,
we allocate the union.  That's wrong.


Thanks.  Diego.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]