This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: V3 PATCH: numeric_limits<> support, fix PR/3865
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
- Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 17:19:46 -0700
- Subject: Re: V3 PATCH: numeric_limits<> support, fix PR/3865
- References: <20020903203838.GB9129@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 05:47:16PM -0600, Roger Sayle wrote:
> I agree that if the above statement
> where executed at run-time I'd expect a SIGFPE, but as an initializer
> to a global constant?
What's the distinction in C++, where global constants *can*
be initialized at runtime?