This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: builtin float.h macros
Richard Henderson wrote:-
> That doesn't help the p-/p+ thing.
> What would break if we unconditionally interpreted p- as
> valid for a preprocessor number? I can't think of any
> alternate valid interpretations of 0x1p-22...
Nothing I can think of. It's fine by me; rejecting it was always a
bit extreme in my opinion. If you do this, please blow away the
extended_numbers flag as I think it would become unused.