This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: V3 PATCH: numeric_limits<> support, fix PR/3865


On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 11:57:46AM -0600, Roger Sayle wrote:
> bool has_snan = !(__builtin_snan("") == 0.0);

If -fsignaling-nan, this ought to result in sigfpe.
Thus you can't do that.

> Otherwise I agree that we might also need __builtin_has_snan{,f,l} to
> determine whether we support signaling NaNs.

There's two questions of "support".  (1) Can we represent the value,
and (2) do we conserve signals.  I suspect that std::numeric_limits
only cares about question 1, and not about question 2.


r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]