This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH to avoid copying tail padding (was: GCC 3.2)

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: nathan at cs dot bris dot ac dot uk, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 19:40:35 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH to avoid copying tail padding (was: GCC 3.2)
References: <40360000.1027723811@gandalf.codesourcery.com> <200207271635.12319@enzo.bigblue.local> <wvlptx6m7pd.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <wvly9bsk9gg.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <3000000.1028131037@gandalf.codesourcery.com> <wvl8z3qjlxc.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <wvlfzxxiicg.fsf_-_@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <wvl8z2xpzrb.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <3D6622F1.51D3BA13@acm.org> <wvlit21ocqh.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com>

On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 03:45:26PM +0100, Jason Merrill wrote:
> If we're not going to try to DTRT, I think I'd rather change it to a call
> to abort() or some such.

Note that expand_builtin_va_arg calls expand_builtin_trap 
in a case like this.  The front end could similarly expand
a call to __builtin_trap().

r~

References:
- Re: GCC 3.2
  - From: Jason Merrill
- PATCH to avoid copying tail padding (was: GCC 3.2)
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: PATCH to avoid copying tail padding (was: GCC 3.2)
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: PATCH to avoid copying tail padding (was: GCC 3.2)
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: PATCH to avoid copying tail padding (was: GCC 3.2)
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]