This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libgcc2 versus x86_64 Ada
- From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, geert at gnat dot com
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 10:37:39 -0400
- Subject: Re: libgcc2 versus x86_64 Ada
>>>>> Jan Hubicka writes:
Jan> Hmm, that is also possible. I didn't noticed we do have IN_LIBGCC2.
Jan> Is that considered cleaner approach than the former?
Jan> (we do use the LIBGCC2_* macros for some other stuff and from some kind
Jan> it looks to me cleaner to not reuse same macro for two different purposes)
Yes, I think using IN_LIBGCC2 is cleaner and it allows you to
limit the modifications to i386.h only. Such a change might even be
considered "obvious".
I am planning to use that approach for PowerPC. As I mentioned
before, the Sparc port uses it as well. There is no need for another
macro in libgcc2.c.
David