This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Unreviewed Patch
> From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 05:44:57PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> > Yes, and I think, that's bad. There is no reason to have CLASS_MAX_NREGS
> > or HARD_REGNO_NREGS return signed values. (LOOP_REGNO_NREGS is defined in
> > terms of HARD_REGNO_NREGS, so that's just the same)
>
> This is why moving to target hooks is good. Functions have a
> better defined interface than macros.
> r~
Agreed. I'll have a look at these hooks.
In the mean time, can I install the original patch?
(Note, except for a couple coming from bison output, the patch
addresses all remaining signed/unsigned warnings appearing on irix6
and solaris2.)
--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi Director of Systems Architecture
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu Qwest Solutions