This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] new portlet: cirrus-maverick
- From: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
- To: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
- Cc: rearnsha at arm dot com, nickc at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rsandifo at redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:43:07 -0400
- Subject: Re: [patch] new portlet: cirrus-maverick
- References: <20020814085752.A11136@redhat.com>
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:57:52AM -0700, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> -mnop-fun-dllimport @gol
> + -mmaverick-fix-invalid-insns -mno-maverick-fix-invalid-insns @gol
> -mtpcs-frame -mtpcs-leaf-frame @gol
> *************** Allows calls via function pointers (incl
> of executing a function pointer if this option is enabled.
> +
> + @item -mmaverick-fix-invalid-insns
> + @opindex mmaverick-fix-invalid-insns
> + Insert nops to fix invalid Maverick instruction combinations.
> +
> + @item -mno-maverick-fix-invalid-insns
> + @opindex mno-maverick-fix-invalid-insns
> + Do not insert nops to fix invalid Maverick instruction combinations.
I thought the convention was to only document the option that was /not/
the default? Or at least to describe which of the flags was on by default.
Phil
--
I would therefore like to posit that computing's central challenge, viz. "How
not to make a mess of it," has /not/ been met.
- Edsger Dijkstra, 1930-2002