This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: patch applied to sh port: suppress some warnings.




--On Tuesday, August 13, 2002 04:34:05 PM -0300 Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:

On Aug 13, 2002, Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@superh.com> wrote:

No, it is in accordance with the steering commitee decision that most
ports should be ANSIfied.
	
Odd...  I remember the very opposite to have been decided when someone
asked for clarification regarding what to do about ports.  For all I
know, they're part of the backend, and so the general rules say they
should still be buildable with K&R C.  Some leeway could be used on
ports that are only ever built with ISO C compilers (i.e., those that
can't be cross-built without GCC and those for platforms whose native
compilers have always been ISO C-compliant).  But this is all quoted
from memory, so I'd appreciate if someone would set me straight if I'm
mistaken on any of these points.
I believe you (Alexandre) are correct.

--
Mark Mitchell                mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]