This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: cpplib: Start moving switch handling to front ends
- From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Devang Patel <dpatel at apple dot com>
- Cc: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>, Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 19:06:00 +0100
- Subject: Re: cpplib: Start moving switch handling to front ends
- Organization: Codesourcery LLC
- References: <8F40CC42-AAF6-11D6-A6B4-00039362EF82@apple.com>
Devang Patel wrote:
> Personally I do not have hard opinion about this, but I have not seen
> any guide-lines about use of special chars like '#' in warning names.
>
> If everybody thinks, it is not OK then I will change it to
> -Wno-pound-warnings.
'scuse me, but over here pound is not the name of the #
char, 'cos that is a much better name for another character
which may or may not be rendered correctly as '£'
I know gcc is written in US english, but let's try not to
be confusing!
>From the jargon file:
The pronunciation of # as `pound' is common in the U.S. but a
bad idea; Commonwealth Hackish has its own, rather more apposite
use of `pound sign' (confusingly, on British keyboards the pound
graphic happens to replace #; thus Britishers sometimes call #
on a U.S.-ASCII keyboard `pound', compounding the American error).
The U.S. usage derives from an old-fashioned commercial practice
of using a # suffix to tag pound weights on bills of lading. The
character is usually pronounced `hash' outside the U.S. There
are more culture wars over the correct pronunciation of this
character than any other, which has led to the ha ha only serious
suggestion that it be pronounced `shibboleth' (see Judges 12:6 in
an Old Testament or Tanakh).
nathan
--
Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org