This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] libobjc and ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN rs6000 changes (was Re: 81 GCC regressions, 79 new, with your patch on 2002-08-07T23:24:57Z.)
- From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: aldyh at redhat dot com, geoffk at redhat dot com, Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>, gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 13:07:03 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] libobjc and ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN rs6000 changes (was Re: 81 GCC regressions, 79 new, with your patch on 2002-08-07T23:24:57Z.)
I would really like to understand the reason for removing all of
the original definitions of ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN in the PowerPC port. This
seems completely unrelated to the bitfields fix. All that it has done is
cause breakage and requires yet another GCC 3.2 pre-release.
Why shouldn't the PowerPC part of the patch be reverted?
David