This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, arm] Stack the PIC register for Thumb if PIC is enabled

From: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
To: Adam Nemet <anemet at Lnxw dot COM>
Cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 08 Aug 2002 12:10:04 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH, arm] Stack the PIC register for Thumb if PIC is enabled
References: <200207311232.NAA07048@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com><hcvg6v5ald.fsf@anemet1.lynx.com><m3r8hiy6ro.fsf_-_@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com><hck7n94sl8.fsf@anemet1.lynx.com><m3ptx1tgb6.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com><hc3ctt4sz1.fsf@anemet1.lynx.com>

Hi Adam,

> If you meant -mpic-register=6 together with -mthumb then yes that
> fails even without the patch.  I checked my regression-baseline logs
> and also tried manually with an unpatched cc1.  I think the patch is
> safe. 

Ah, I was hoping that that was the case.  So...

> 2002-07-09  Adam Nemet  <anemet@lnxw.com>
> 
> 	* config/arm/arm.c (thumb_unexpanded_epilogue): Stack the PIC
> 	register.
> 	(thumb_expand_prologue): Likewise.
> 	(thumb_output_function_prologue): Likewise.
> 	* config/arm/arm.h (THUMB_INITIAL_ELIMINATION_OFFSET): Account for
> 	the additional push of the PIC register.

Approved and applied.

Cheers
        Nick

References:
- Re: [PATCH, arm] Stack the PIC register for Thumb if PIC is enabled
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: [PATCH, arm] Stack the PIC register for Thumb if PIC is enabled
  - From: Adam Nemet
- Re: [PATCH, arm] Stack the PIC register for Thumb if PIC is enabled
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: [PATCH, arm] Stack the PIC register for Thumb if PIC is enabled
  - From: Adam Nemet

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]