This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] C++ space optimization: de-cloning con/de/structors

From: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Matt Austern <austern at apple dot com>, Stuart Hastings <stuart at apple dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 13:26:04 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] C++ space optimization: de-cloning con/de/structors
Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
References: <33320000.1028674010@warlock.codesourcery.com>

Mark Mitchell wrote:

> Matt Austern:

Are we currently using multiple entry points for anything other than
the Fortran ENTRY statement?

No, we're not.  In fact, we don't even support ENTRY, as far as I know.

Well, obviously, we do - otherwise we couldn't call g77 a Fortran 77 compiler :-)

The implementation of ENTRY is discussed in our documentation:

http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77/Alternative-Entry-Points.html

[Note: GBE stands for GNU Back End]

--
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] C++ space optimization: de-cloning con/de/structors
  - From: Stuart Hastings

References:
- Re: [PATCH] C++ space optimization: de-cloning con/de/structors
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]