This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] 3.2: Fixup symbol versioning mistake on powerpc-linux-gnu

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 14:55:17 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 3.2: Fixup symbol versioning mistake on powerpc-linux-gnu
References: <15900000.1028516999@warlock.codesourcery.com> <200208062313.10653@enzo.bigblue.local> <20020806172313.W1596@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <200208062347.00630@enzo.bigblue.local>

On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 11:47:00PM +0200, Franz Sirl wrote:
> Doesn't that setup cause the linker to complain like that:
> 
> /lib/libgcc_s.so.1(*IND*+0x0): multiple definition of `__divdi3@GLIBC_2.0'
> /lib/libc.so.6(.text+0x574): first defined here
> 
> I think that's what I've seen when I tried that, iirc.

If so, that is a bug.  This shouldn't cause a problem any
more than having the symbol "foo" in both libraries.


r~

References:
- Re: [PATCH] 3.2: Fixup symbol versioning mistake onpowerpc-linux-gnu
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [PATCH] 3.2: Fixup symbol versioning mistake on powerpc-linux-gnu
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: [PATCH] 3.2: Fixup symbol versioning mistake on powerpc-linux-gnu
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] 3.2: Fixup symbol versioning mistake on powerpc-linux-gnu
  - From: Franz Sirl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]