This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH RFA] mips "Branch Likely" handling behaviour,options.

From: cgd at broadcom dot com
To: "Richard Sandiford" <rsandifo at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,echristo at redhat dot com
Date: 02 Aug 2002 09:31:33 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFA] mips "Branch Likely" handling behaviour,options.
References: <yov5u1mdkdb9.fsf@broadcom.com><wvnr8hhclb9.fsf@talisman.cambridge.redhat.com><yov5ptx11bse.fsf@broadcom.com><wvnn0s5cjnh.fsf@talisman.cambridge.redhat.com>

At 02 Aug 2002 17:25:38 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Bit X of t_f_e is set if bit X of target_flags was explicitly set or
> cleared.  Is that what you need?  

yes, exactly.  I didn't read the code that sets target_flags_explicit
carefully enough... let alone its comment.  8-)

thanks.

OK, will do-over & resend after testing.

chris

References:
- [PATCH RFA] mips "Branch Likely" handling behaviour, options.
  - From: cgd
- Re: [PATCH RFA] mips "Branch Likely" handling behaviour, options.
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: [PATCH RFA] mips "Branch Likely" handling behaviour,options.
  - From: cgd
- Re: [PATCH RFA] mips "Branch Likely" handling behaviour, options.
  - From: Richard Sandiford

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]